2026-09.1 record

Radiology and medical imaging software

Most named checked vendor

87 of 150 valid answers named Sectra

87 of 150 valid answers, 58.0% (Wilson 95% interval 50.0% to 65.6%)

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09, version 2026-09.1. Method v1.1. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

Software a hospital, imaging center, or teleradiology group buys to store, view, route, and report medical images and run the radiology workflow around them (PACS, RIS, enterprise imaging).

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Capture date: 2026-09-21. The Index measures observed naming, not service quality or product merit.

Commissioned engagement: no.

Dispute policy · Explore the buyer questions

Discuss this category's evidence

Criteria Maps

Observed buyer requirements before the first vendor in source answers captured on 22 and 23 September 2026. 149 valid source answers from 150 scheduled runs. These observations are separate from the original Index release figures.

Each vendor figure uses the median across the five most named vendors in the frozen category release, including zero counts. Adjacency compares distinct source answers for the same criterion; page coverage compares criteria for the same page state. Medians are descriptive and have no confidence interval.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team. Team review: in progress. Zero analyst verified criteria.

The AI written RFP; Study DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23271935. Source DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695. CC BY 4.0.

Observed source answer frequencies. Wilson intervals describe the calculation, not independent population inference. Repeated runs are not independent performance tests. Page comparisons cover only the dated page and stated scope. An unstated claim is not an absent product feature.

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Checklist Audit $490. Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Fit with stated practice needs or workflows
25 of 149; 16.8%; Wilson 95% interval 11.6% to 23.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q1: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q10: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 22 source answers
- AbbaDox: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Agfa: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Candelis: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Carestream: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- DeepHealth: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Epic: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Exa: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Fujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- INFINITT: 6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Intelerad: 7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Konica: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- MedicsRIS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Medinformatix: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Nova: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- NovaPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Novarad: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- OmniPACS: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pricing/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- OnePACS: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Orthanc: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Philips: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- PostDICOM: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pricing/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Q/ris: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- RamSoft: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Roentgen: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Sectra: 8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Simplirad: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- Visage Imaging: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
- dcm4chee: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- eRAD: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%
Cost appropriate to the imaging practice budget
17 of 149; 11.4%; Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q1: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q10: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 17 source answers
- AdvaPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Candelis: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- INFINITT: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Konica: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- MIMIC: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Medicai: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OmniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OnePACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Orthanc: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PicomCloud: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PostDICOM: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- ProtonPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- sepStream: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Fit with the preferred deployment model
13 of 149; 8.7%; Wilson 95% interval 5.2% to 14.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 11 source answers
- RamSoft: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Ease of use
12 of 149; 8.1%; Wilson 95% interval 4.7% to 13.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Capacity to grow with practice needs
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Cloud based deployment
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q3: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers
- AdvaPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Intelerad: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- MIMIC: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Medicai: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- MiniPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OmniPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OnePACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Paxera: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PostDICOM: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Radsource: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- sepStream: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Costs over the system lifecycle
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Customer support
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
- OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Proton: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Integration with EHR and RIS systems
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.science.gov/topicpages/p/pacs+implementation+process: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Interoperability with existing systems
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Advanced visualization including 3D or image fusion
10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Configurable hanging protocols
10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Fast image access or responsive viewing
10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
AI tool integration or diagnostic assistance
9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 9 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data encryption
9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Demonstration or evaluation evidence
9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=59&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Patient data security safeguards
9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Backup and disaster recovery arrangements
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
DICOM compatibility
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.science.gov/topicpages/p/pacs+implementation+process: 3 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Disaster recovery arrangements
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for required imaging modalities
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Access controls
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1
https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Applicable healthcare and data protection compliance
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Audit logging
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear pricing and fees
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Diagnostic image or display quality
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=59&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
HL7 or FHIR interoperability
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Pay per study pricing suited to low or variable volume
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2
https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
- OmniPACS: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PicomCloud: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- ProtonPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Radsource: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- sepStream: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Automatic retrieval of prior studies
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reading worklist management
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Remote access and reading
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for clinical subspecialties
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
System performance
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Training and education for operational users
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Configurable user interface
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Encryption of data at rest and in transit
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Imaging data migration arrangements
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Low local server or infrastructure overhead
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 5 source answers
- Konica: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Predictable subscription pricing
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q3: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2
https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
- MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PACScribe: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Redundancy and fault tolerance
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reliable retrieval of prior studies including older archives
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Subscription pricing
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 5 source answers
- Medicai: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OmniPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PACScribe: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- PostDICOM: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
System reliability
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 5 source answers
- Sectra: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Voice recognition, dictation or transcription
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Access controls and role based permissions
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Compatibility with existing or vendor neutral archives
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1
https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Continuous system or network performance monitoring
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Image manipulation tools
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Multifactor authentication
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Patient identification or demographic handling
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
References or evidence from comparable facilities
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reporting functionality
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Usable data export
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Ability to self host the imaging system
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q3: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
- MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Orthanc: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- dcm4chee: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Access to prior studies
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
After hours or round the clock support
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Automation of repetitive imaging workflows
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Contractual terms
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
DICOM compatibility and conformance evidence
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/2022b/output/chtml/part18/chapter_6.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/chapter_6.html: 1 source answers; https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined maximum acceptable data loss
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined maximum recovery time
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Documented service availability commitments
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Evidence of successful restoration or failover tests
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Migration data validation
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Order or examination status handling
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Patient identity matching and demographic reconciliation
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reliable service and business continuity
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Remote access to imaging information
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Security patching and vulnerability management commitments
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Software upgrade support
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Structured reporting
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for required imaging modalities and clinical specialties
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Usable bulk data export with defined formats, throughput and fees
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Usable interface and efficient navigation
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Usable workflows during network, server or site outages
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
User authentication controls
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Working connections with existing modalities, RIS, EHR and reporting systems
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
API access for data exchange
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Access to prior studies during transition and defined cutover handling
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Applicable IHE workflow integration evidence
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/2022b/output/chtml/part18/chapter_6.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://profiles.ihe.net/RAD/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Scheduled_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Business associate agreement
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
DICOMweb interfaces
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data backup arrangements
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data return or access after termination
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/may-a-hipaa-covered-entity-or-business-associate-use-cloud-service-to-store-or-process-ephi/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Demonstrated performance on representative studies and workflows
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Efficient patient and examination scheduling
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- RamSoft: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Fit with the preferred EHR alignment, workflow, multisite standardization or consolidation priority
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q2: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- AbbaDox: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Epic: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Intelerad: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- MedicsRIS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- RISynergy: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- RamSoft: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Integration with a radiology information system
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Outside image import and reconciliation
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Outside study import or handling
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Performance over the actual remote reading connection
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Performance under realistic concurrent user load
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reading and workflow coordination across sites
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Intelerad: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Reading worklists and study routing
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Referring clinician access
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Report amendment or update handling
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reporting integration
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Required functions currently available
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Rights to imaging data
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Rollback arrangements for failed migration or launch
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Shared workspaces, messages and study notes
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Single sign on
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Synchronized study comparison
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Vendor references or reference evidence
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Vendor viability and continued product development
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Automated data exchange between connected systems
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Automatic software installation and updates
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Billing functionality
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Billing system integration
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Business associate agreement and security responsibility allocation
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clinical collaboration
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Configurable reading worklists and study routing
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Connected image, clinical information and reporting workflows
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Connected or coordinated radiology workflows
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Fujifilm (Synapse): 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Intelerad: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Controlled vendor remote access
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Critical result notifications
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined migration cutover handling
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Diagnostic viewer suited to required client architecture
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Ease of deployment
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Candelis: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- INFINITT: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Konica: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Fast image prefetching
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Fast remote image viewing
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Fit with clinical reading workflows and operational needs
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3
https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Full lifecycle costs including infrastructure, services and exit
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Image manipulation and measurement tools
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Image measurement tools
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Image sharing
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Implementation assistance and defined launch responsibilities
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Implementation support
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Incident response and vendor notification arrangements
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Incident response arrangements
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Insurance pre authorization tracking
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Integration with a picture archiving and communication system
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Long term archive capacity planning
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Manageable implementation and ongoing IT administration
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Migration support
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Open source availability
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Orthanc: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- dcm4chee: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Patient check in
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Patient communication and engagement
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Patient consent management
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Patient data access and activity audit logs
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Patient intake or portal access
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Reconciliation of acquisitions and reports after downtime
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reporting workflow integration and report handling
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Required functions currently delivered and tested
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Responsive support and escalation commitments
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
SOC 2 Type II assurance
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Safeguards against duplicate reading
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Structured reporting and report templates
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Study comparison tools
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for multisite operations
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for the specific interfaces required by the buyer environment
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Synchronization between PACS and RIS
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Synchronized scrolling and study comparison tools
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Validation of migration completeness, identity and image integrity
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Vendor incident notifications
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Worklists suited to site, specialty and coverage needs
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

Download complete category evidence · Download manifest and source hashes

Full checked set, sorted by observed counts, not a ranking.
Vendor	Named	Vendor domain cited
Sectra	87 of 150 valid answers, 58.0% (Wilson 95% interval 50.0% to 65.6%)	19 of 150 valid answers, 12.7% (Wilson 95% interval 8.3% to 18.9%)
Intelerad	80 of 150 valid answers, 53.3% (Wilson 95% interval 45.4% to 61.1%)	31 of 150 valid answers, 20.7% (Wilson 95% interval 15.0% to 27.8%)
Visage Imaging	65 of 150 valid answers, 43.3% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 51.3%)	18 of 150 valid answers, 12.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.7% to 18.2%)
Fujifilm (Synapse)	51 of 150 valid answers, 34.0% (Wilson 95% interval 26.9% to 41.9%)	14 of 150 valid answers, 9.3% (Wilson 95% interval 5.6% to 15.1%)
RamSoft	46 of 150 valid answers, 30.7% (Wilson 95% interval 23.8% to 38.5%)	18 of 150 valid answers, 12.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.7% to 18.2%)
Agfa HealthCare	41 of 150 valid answers, 27.3% (Wilson 95% interval 20.8% to 35.0%)	4 of 150 valid answers, 2.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%)
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)	27 of 150 valid answers, 18.0% (Wilson 95% interval 12.7% to 24.9%)	2 of 150 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%)
GE HealthCare	24 of 150 valid answers, 16.0% (Wilson 95% interval 11.0% to 22.7%)	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)
INFINITT Healthcare	17 of 150 valid answers, 11.3% (Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%)	1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Novarad	17 of 150 valid answers, 11.3% (Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%)	7 of 150 valid answers, 4.7% (Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%)
AbbaDox	16 of 150 valid answers, 10.7% (Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.6%)	8 of 150 valid answers, 5.3% (Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%)
Merative (Merge)	16 of 150 valid answers, 10.7% (Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.6%)	1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
PostDICOM	15 of 150 valid answers, 10.0% (Wilson 95% interval 6.2% to 15.8%)	10 of 150 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%)
Siemens Healthineers	13 of 150 valid answers, 8.7% (Wilson 95% interval 5.1% to 14.3%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
eRAD	12 of 150 valid answers, 8.0% (Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%)	7 of 150 valid answers, 4.7% (Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%)
OnePACS	12 of 150 valid answers, 8.0% (Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%)	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)
Carestream Health	10 of 150 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
MedInformatix	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)	3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)
Pro Medicus	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)	2 of 150 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%)
AdvaPACS	5 of 150 valid answers, 3.3% (Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
PaxeraHealth	4 of 150 valid answers, 2.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%)	1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Mach7 Technologies	3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)	1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Canon Medical Informatics	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Hyland	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)

The ten buyer questions

Each question was put to every engine 3 times on the stated dates. Counts are over valid answers to the exact question.

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Question q1. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Question q2. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Question q3. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Question q4. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Question q5. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Question q6. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Question q7. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Question q8. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Question q9. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Question q10. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Release and method

Release: 2026-09, version 2026-09.1
Published: 2026-09-23
Answer capture date: 2026-09-22
Source capture dates: 2026-09-21
Engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode
Configuration: 10 fixed target questions, 5 engines, 3 repeats. No controls were run for this category.
Method version: v1.1
Excluded answers: 0 target answers excluded; exact reasons are listed. No controls were run for this category.
Commissioned engagement: No commissioned engagement is declared for this category.

Exact names and listed aliases are matched without case sensitivity at word boundaries. Plain word names require a listed qualifier nearby in the same sentence or the canonical domain among cited URLs. A vendor citation counts only when that answer also names the vendor under this rule.

Verbatim answer text is retained privately with the measurement input and import audit. No answer quotations are published here.

Download and cite

Release JSON · Category CSV · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

How to cite: Broadcastwell. The Absence Index, Radiology and medical imaging software, version 2026-09.1. Permanent record. CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Broadcastwell.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

This public record reports the checked set, fixed questions and stated dates. Claim a vendor page, file a dispute or ask for a re-run, or read the dispute policy and log.

Read this page as JSON · Dataset and page metadata

Radiology and medical imaging software

Criteria Maps

Fit with stated practice needs or workflows

Cost appropriate to the imaging practice budget

Fit with the preferred deployment model

Ease of use

Capacity to grow with practice needs

Cloud based deployment

Costs over the system lifecycle

Customer support

Integration with EHR and RIS systems

Interoperability with existing systems

Advanced visualization including 3D or image fusion

Configurable hanging protocols

Fast image access or responsive viewing

AI tool integration or diagnostic assistance

Data encryption

Demonstration or evaluation evidence

Patient data security safeguards

Backup and disaster recovery arrangements

DICOM compatibility

Disaster recovery arrangements

Support for required imaging modalities

Access controls

Applicable healthcare and data protection compliance

Audit logging

Clear pricing and fees

Diagnostic image or display quality

HL7 or FHIR interoperability

Pay per study pricing suited to low or variable volume

Automatic retrieval of prior studies

Reading worklist management

Remote access and reading

Support for clinical subspecialties

System performance

Training and education for operational users

Configurable user interface

Encryption of data at rest and in transit

Imaging data migration arrangements

Low local server or infrastructure overhead

Predictable subscription pricing

Redundancy and fault tolerance

Reliable retrieval of prior studies including older archives

Subscription pricing

System reliability

Voice recognition, dictation or transcription

Access controls and role based permissions

Compatibility with existing or vendor neutral archives

Continuous system or network performance monitoring

Image manipulation tools

Multifactor authentication

Patient identification or demographic handling

References or evidence from comparable facilities

Reporting functionality

Usable data export

Ability to self host the imaging system

Access to prior studies

After hours or round the clock support

Automation of repetitive imaging workflows

Contractual terms

DICOM compatibility and conformance evidence

Defined maximum acceptable data loss

Defined maximum recovery time

Documented service availability commitments

Evidence of successful restoration or failover tests

Migration data validation

Order or examination status handling

Patient identity matching and demographic reconciliation

Reliable service and business continuity

Remote access to imaging information

Security patching and vulnerability management commitments

Software upgrade support

Structured reporting

Support for required imaging modalities and clinical specialties

Usable bulk data export with defined formats, throughput and fees

Usable interface and efficient navigation

Usable workflows during network, server or site outages

User authentication controls

Working connections with existing modalities, RIS, EHR and reporting systems

API access for data exchange