Head to head · Project management · release 2026-09
Wrike vs Asana Wrike was named in 54 of 150 answers about project management; Asana in 97. There was no question where Wrike was named and Asana was not. All five engines named Wrike at least once.
Asana is the most named checked vendor in project management in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.
One capture on 22 September 2026 and 23 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.
The Wrike record · The Asana record
Side by side All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality. Measure Wrike Asana Named 54 of 150 (36.0%, Wilson 95% interval 28.8% to 43.9%) 97 of 150 (64.7%, Wilson 95% interval 56.7% to 71.9%) Own domain cited 34 of 150 (22.7%, Wilson 95% interval 16.7% to 30.0%) 42 of 150 (28.0%, Wilson 95% interval 21.4% to 35.7%)
By question Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.
By engine Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.
Wrike and Asana, named per engine. Vendor ChatGPT Claude Perplexity Google AI Overviews Google AI Mode Wrike 6 of 30 18 of 30 14 of 30 9 of 30 7 of 30 Asana 21 of 30 15 of 30 19 of 30 19 of 30 23 of 30
Measured head to head No question in this release asked the engines to choose between Wrike and Asana; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.
What the engines said about each Wrike is best for complex enterprise cross-team workflows.
Claude, 22 September 2026 . Full answer text in the deposit . Asana would be my default pick for a cross-functional team, especially one combining marketing, operations, product, and other business functions.
ChatGPT, 22 September 2026 . Full answer text in the deposit . Dash punctuation normalized. One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 .
What to do with this Wrike claims its record, free, and runs the free check on its own name. The widest gap is on “What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?”: that is the question to fix with Answer Repair, $490. Asana claims its record, free: claim the Asana record . Buyers: both figures are observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. Ask each vendor for a dated record. Free 10-question check (one engine)
No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.
Claim or correct this record
Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair : one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms .
Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.
Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.
Receipt Release 2026-09, published 23 September 2026 DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 Method v1.1 : ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engineCaptured 22 September 2026 , 23 September 2026 Base 150 valid answers across ten questions; 0 excluded Licence CC BY 4.0 , attribution to BroadcastwellDisputes Dispute policy and log Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com
Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
About this page Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
Buyer questions · What AI names instead · Head to head · Statement records · Method · Dispute policy