Head to head · Hotel property management software · release 2026-09

ThinkReservations vs Cloudbeds

ThinkReservations: 11 of 149. Cloudbeds: 115 of 149. Same ten buyer questions, same five engines, same day. There was no question where ThinkReservations was named and Cloudbeds was not. All five engines named ThinkReservations at least once.

Cloudbeds is the most named checked vendor in hotel property management software in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.

One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.

The ThinkReservations record · The Cloudbeds record

Side by side

All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
MeasureThinkReservationsCloudbeds
Named11 of 149 (7.4%, Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%)115 of 149 (77.2%, Wilson 95% interval 69.8% to 83.2%)
Own domain cited2 of 149 (1.3%, Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%)38 of 149 (25.5%, Wilson 95% interval 19.2% to 33.1%)

By question

Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.

By engine

Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.

ThinkReservations and Cloudbeds, named per engine.
VendorChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI OverviewsGoogle AI Mode
ThinkReservations1 of 305 of 301 of 301 of 293 of 30
Cloudbeds26 of 3024 of 3021 of 3021 of 2923 of 30

Measured head to head

No question in this release asked the engines to choose between ThinkReservations and Cloudbeds; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.

What the engines said about each

For a U.S. inn, include ThinkReservations in those demos.

ChatGPT, . Full answer text in the deposit.

I’d start with Cloudbeds for an all-around independent-hotel PMS, but for a very small, owner-operated hotel, I’d compare Little Hotelier first.

ChatGPT, . Full answer text in the deposit. Dash punctuation normalized.

One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695.

What to do with this

Free 10-question check (one engine)

No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.

Claim or correct this record

Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair: one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms.

Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.

Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Receipt

Release
2026-09, published
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22907695
Method
v1.1: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engine
Captured
Base
149 valid answers across ten questions; 1 excluded
Licence
CC BY 4.0, attribution to Broadcastwell
Disputes
Dispute policy and log

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.

Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Buyer questions · What AI names instead · Head to head · Statement records · Method · Dispute policy